Between 60 and 70 grads were told that their diplomas are being withheld as part of a new policy punishing those students who received any applause or shout-outs after their names were called during the graduation ceremony.
They will be able to collect their diplomas on Monday.
According to eyewitness accounts, angered parents clamored for their children's diplomas outside of the old gym following the ceremony. Parents were told that an administrator would come and address their concerns, but instead the doors to the building were locked and police called out to keep the situation under control.
Parents and grandparents then drove to the A.B. Gibson Center and were met by officers who threatened to arrest anyone who did not leave the premises.
Vernicetine Penny was irate that her daughter, Antionque Penny, did not get her diploma after completing her coursework at the School of Visual and Performing Arts.
"Our children walked these halls for 12 to 14 years," Penny said. "They can not be disciplined because of what someone else did. They did what they were supposed to do in school to get this piece of paper, so why are they being held accountable for somebody else."
Penny said she had no idea who cheered for her child at the ceremony.
"I don't know who shouted," she said. "There were other people shouting. How can they prove who shouted. People can not like you and shout your child's name if they know that the decision could be made to hold the diploma. They can't prove who shouted."
Her daughter had a number of issues with the school, the last of which was a $500 bill from the band, delivered to her the day before graduation, that had to be paid before a diploma would be issued.
"I paid off her debt and they still did not give my child her diploma," she said. "It was not because of her, but because me and (Principal Jonathan) McRae got into a dispute."
Shen Campbell, a graduate of the School of Math, Science and Technology, was among those seniors who will have to wait three days for his diploma.
"My diploma was pulled out – I don't know why," Campbell said. "They say if they hear your group holler your name, they'll check out your name on the chart and they will hold your diploma against you because no one should be shouting names, but I didn't hear my group so I don't know why they took my diploma ... This is my moment, but I'm not angry, I'm not upset. I'll just explain to them on Monday."
He said it "doesn't make any sense" for administrators to hold diplomas because of outbursts.
"No one should be punished because this is our day and at every ceremony, everybody has shouted their name so there is no reason to hold our diploma," Campbell said.
Reva Jackson, a graduate of the School of Leadership and Public Service, made no apologies for vocally supporting her friends, a tradition that cost her getting a diploma following the ceremony.
"I'm going to holler for them," she said. "They are going to holler for me, it's graduation – it's what you're supposed to do. It's stupid. I did what I was supposed to do. I passed my classes, I got my grades and I was able to walk across the stage but I can't get my diploma."
Wendy Jackson, Reva Jackson's mother, favored voting out the Scotland County Board of Education over the diploma issue.
"My tax dollars that paid for her to come to school is paying for these people in here that are trying to hold these diplomas," she said.
The decision to withhold her daughter's diploma has diminished her accomplishment and that of everyone else who is going home empty handed, Wendy Jackson said.
"Today, they have ruined graduation for Scotland County Schools," she said. "First they ruined it by making them the Guinea Pigs and making them graduate at nine o'clock in the morning, where us parents had to take off; second, they have sat there and ruined it because they will not give them their diploma."
Kozma McLean said there is no reason to hold her daughter's diploma as she videotaped the ceremony and can prove that her family did not shout out her son's name.
"I have empirical evidence that I did not yell and I did not say anything," she said. "I asked them if they could view the video tape so they could see that I did not yell, but they refused to pay attention to the tape."
McLean said she obeyed the policy and her child was still punished.
"Some of us did not yell and followed the instructions like the school asked us to and this is what we get. It's a shame that some students work really hard ... and this is their end result. This is not fair."
Ethel Stanner, who came from Wisconsin with her husband, Tony, to watch their granddaughter graduate was also upset about the decision to withhold diplomas.
"I think it's ridiculous," Stanner said. "After all the years they put in, they should have the diploma."
At least one school board member was upset about diplomas being held.
Vice-Chairman Mary Evans said it's no surprise that family and friends of graduates cheered for the seniors as they walked across the state.
"This is a celebratory event and it is hard to contain the excitement of the kids and the parents and the grandparents," she said.
Upholding the rules is one thing, she said, but keeping a number of graduates from getting their diplomas was too much.
"I don't think that it should happen to the magnitude that it causes protests," she said. "I would have hoped that it could have been handled a little bit better."
She also questioned how administrators could decide which of the 412 graduates deserved to have their diplomas withheld.
"How do you come to the conclusion that the family members of these students were involved," she asked.
Evans said board members try not to "micromanage" administrators, who made the decision on holding diplomas.
"We try to let the administrators do what they do best," she said. "When it becomes a board issue is when we get involved."
She said they may need to "reshape" the policy.
"I think Scotland County had a lot to celebrate today with all the children graduating," Evans said. "The focus should have been on that instead of trying to restrain them. It's an unfortunate situation and it saddens me."
Superintendent Rick Stout said he stood behind the high school administrators who developed the policy.
"(Executive Director of Secondary Education) Myra (Holloway) and the high school staff made a decision on how they would handle noise in the stands and make it a dignified event," Stout said.
School spokesman Andy Cagle also defended the policy.
"We very clearly communicated the expectations to students and the parents, and it was re-communicated a number of times during the graduation ceremony," Cagle said. "Everyone in that stadium knew the expectational behavior and knew the consequences. Some people chose not to comply. They can come back Monday and pick up their child's diploma."
Administrators tried to be understanding to the celebratory nature of graduation and allowed families to cheer before the presentation of diplomas, he said.
"Holloway got up at the beginning of the ceremony and gave everyone a chance to wave at their kids, to scream, to do all that so when we got to the actual ceremony where we were conferring diplomas, that parents were able to hear their kids' names called," Cagle said.
During the ceremony, Holloway explained the policy.
"As we celebrate this occasion, please offer the gift of a dignified graduation ceremony," she said. "All students and their parents deserve to hear their name called during the graduation ceremony. Please refrain from yelling out names and any applause until all graduates have been honored.
"All of us want to hear the melodious sound of students' names and see their beaming smiles on their faces. If you choose to yell out and disrupt the graduation, you will be escorted from the stadium and your students' diploma will be held until you make an appointment with the principal."
Similar warnings were repeated several times during the ceremony.
"We want graduation to be a dignified event," Stout said. "Somewhere along the line, we have to get back to what graduation is all about."
Cagle said that the ceremony actually went better than it had in years past.
"I hate that this thing overshadows the accomplishments of our 400 plus graduates," Cagle said.







Thanks for displaying your ignorance to everyone who reads these posts. From the looks of your grammer, you never made it to your on graduation. You have shown your ignorance and left no wonder to how you would have acted. Would you stand up and shout like an idiot at your grandmother's funeral? What if someone stood up and shouted the whole time her eulogy was being read? Words of wisdom for your future path:
"It is better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."
Continue to stay in the quagmire (if you can understand this) and complain. Pull your pants up and point your hat in the direction that your life should be headed and quit blaming everyone else for your shortfalls!
The graduations at SHS have been reprehensible in the past. Uncivilized people who display their lack of education by the way they act. Look at the stands of a SHS graduation and you understand why this county is woefully behind in any academic category.
Academics are supposed to be about civility--not frivolity. Most of the folks that act in such an uncivilized show the rest that they were surprised to get the diploma in the first place.
Probably most who have folks who "holler" think that they have accomplished something by graduating high school. It is insignificant in the world today. Graduate school is minimum in these economic times.
I could careless that Charlene Arrants' granddaughter cried because the superintendent tried to bring some dignity to a ceremony that deserves dignity.
Keep lowering the bar in this community and folks will continue to go down with it.
First, I thought it was classless that this rule was implememted as a student only has a high school graduation once. To ruin the occaasion by holding a diploma is unfair to the ones that earned it. What happens next year when two groups do not get along and as a way to get back at the other is to shout during the ceremony? The way you punish the right people is to escort the trouble makers out of the ceremony.
Now, to all of the ones that are bent out of shape over this rule-you were warned on several occasions to keep your trap shut. Still you chose to break the rules and have no regard for others. The school administrators simply wanted to have a nice ceremony without mornons shouting out like they have never had any training. What example are you setting for your graduating child when you cannot follow directions and have respect for others? You wonder why society has no respect for others? Look in the mirror and see if you are the problem!
Still it is unfair to the students to have this occasion marred whether it is by a crazy policy or a bigmouth who cannot follow directions.
For all you who want to continue to stay in the quagmire and complain about "no jobs", quit crying! Get out of your comfort zone and take the pacifier out of your little mouth. NEWS FLASH!!!! Jobs are not coming to Scotland County so quit laying there waiting on one to come knock on your door! If you choose an "excuse" to stay then quit complaining. Employers do not want to open a business there because the education level is so low. Think about it, people cannot follow directions and keep their mouth shut at a graduation ceremony much less follow a procedure on a job.
The best advice to the recent graduating class; take the review mirror out of the car and drive without looking back!!!
Finally, is it possible for SHS or the school board to publish some statistics on the diplomas that were held? It would be interesting to see the racial make up of diplomas that were held.
Charles A. Walters
Proud Parent of a 2010 Graduate